Form of Power Pressure in The Short Stories Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell and Pelajaran Pertama Bagi Calon Politisi by Kuntowijoyo

Azahra Fadiliawati Agustin; Ujang Suyatman; Lili Awaludin

doi:10.55909/jpbs.v5i2.1307

Authors

Azahra Fadiliawati Agustin English Literature Department, State Islamic University of Gunung Djati, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Ujang Suyatman English Literature Department, State Islamic University of Gunung Djati, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Lili Awaludin English Literature Department, State Islamic University of Gunung Djati, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55909/jpbs.v5i2.1307

Keywords:

form, power pressure, short story

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the forms of power pressure and their influence on the decision-making process of the main characters in the short stories Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell and Pelajaran Pertama Bagi Calon Politisi by Kuntowijoyo. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with a power discourse analysis method based on Michel Foucault's theory. Data sources include narrative excerpts, dialogues, and actions of characters that represent power pressure in both short stories. Data collection techniques were carried out through intensive reading (close reading), while data analysis was carried out through the stages of classifying the forms of power pressure (social, ideological, psychological, and symbolic) and interpreting their influence on the characters' decisions. The results show that power pressure in both short stories is not always present in the form of physical coercion, but operates subtly through discourse, social norms, mass expectations, and normalized political practices. In the short story Shooting an Elephant, mass pressure and the demand to maintain a colonial image force the characters to make decisions that contradict their conscience. Meanwhile, in the short storyPelajaran Pertama Bagi Calon Politisi, ideological pressure and political pragmatism push the characters to sacrifice moral idealism for the sake of power. Thus, this study confirms that power works productively through the internalization of norms that shape ways of thinking and limit the choices that are considered possible, so that the character's decisions are the result of discursive pressure, not entirely free will.

References

Addina, N., & Hanif, M. (2024). Pendidikan dan Kekuasaan: Antara Pembebasan dan Dominasi Perspektif Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu, dan Paulo Freire. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam, 2(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.31004/fdswm377

Aini, R. (2022). Metode Penelitian Sastra Kualitatif: Pendekatan Deskriptif Analitik. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 14(2), 101–115.

Anwar, H. (2023). Qualitative Literary Method: A Refined Approach for Textual Interpretation. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 8(2), 55–64.

Arifudin, M.U.A. (2019). Relasi Kuasa dalam Novel Canting Karya Arswendo Atmowiloto (Kajian Michel Foucault). Jurnal Sapala, 6(1), 1-10. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-sapala/article/view/31742

Bandopadhyay, S. (2021). Methodologies for Comparative Literature. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature, 48(2), 1–18.

Bassnett, S. (2022). Comparative Literature: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Foucault, M. (1976). The history of Sexuality: Volume I – An introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.

Endraswara, S. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Widyatama.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.

Haryatmoko. 2016. Membongkar Rezim Kepastian: Pemikiran Kritis Post-Strukturalis. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Kuntowijoyo, K. (1990). Pelajaran Pertama bagi Calon Politisi. Yogyakarta: Bentang.

Kusuma, S. S. K., & Sudikan, S. Y. (2023). Relasi Kuasa dalam Novel Gadis Kretek Karya Ratih Kumala: Analisis Wacana Kritis Michel Foucault. Jurnal Sapala, 10(3), 24–34. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-sapala/article/view/56512

Latupeirissa, E., & Tjahjono, T. (2021). Relasi Kekuasaan, Pengetahuan dan Moral Tokoh Bujang dalam Novel Pulang Karya Tere Liye (Kajian Relasi Kuasa Michel Foucault). Sastranesia, 9(4), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.32682/sastranesia.v9i4.2195

Lulyastuti, L., & Satriani, I. (2025). Relasi Kuasa dalam Novel Anjing Mengeong, Kucing Menggonggong Karya Eka Kurniawan: Perspektif Michael Foucault. DIDAKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.33096/ didaktis.v3i1.789

Luthan, S. (2007). Hubungan Hukum dan Kekuasaan. Jurnal Hukum, 14(2), 166-184

Mariani, T., Surip, M., & Lubis, M. (2024). Representasi Dominasi Kekuasaan dalam Novel Saman Karya Ayu Utami: Kajian Teori Michel Foucault. Jurnal KIBASP, 7(2), 522–536.

Nasution, S. Y. (2024). Relasi Kuasa dalam Novel Rindu Kubawa Pulang Karya S. Baya: Analisis Wacana Kritis Michel Foucault. Al-Furqan: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, dan Budaya, 3(1), 196–216. https://publisherqu.com/index.php/Al-Furqan/article/view/832

Orwell, G.. (1936). Shooting an Elephant. London: Penguin Books.

Pratama, R. A. (2023). Pemikiran Foucault dan Baron: Kekuasaan dan Pengetahuan dalam Pendidikan dan Bahasa. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 4(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.23887/ jfi.v4i1.30543

Rafillah, R. A. (2025). Wacana Kuasa ala Foucault atas Peran Negara dan Institusi dalam Melanggengkan Ketimpangan Kuasa pada Anak Perempuan Korban Kekerasan Seksual di Pontang, Serang. Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara (JINU), 2(5), 1–22.: https://doi.org/10.61722/ jinu.v2i5.5177

Ramadani, A. S., & Satriani, I. (2025). Relasi Kuasa dan Wacana Resistensi dalam Novel Janji Karya Tere Liye Perspektif Michel Foucault. DIDAKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(2), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.33096/didaktis.v3i2.919

Ratna, N. K. (2015. Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rashid, M. A. (2022). Reconstructing Methodology in Comparative Literary Studies: A Qualitative Perspective. Asian Review of Literary Studies, 7(3), 89–103.

Razak, A. (2017). Menggapai Mixed Methods Bidang Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Pekanbaru: Ababil Press.

Siswadi, G. A. (2024). Relasi Kuasa terhadap Konstruksi Pengetahuan di Sekolah Perspektif Michel Foucault dan Refleksi atas Sistem Pendidikan di Indonesia. Sang Acharya: Jurnal Profesi Guru, 5(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.25078/sa.v5i1.3405

Solomon E. Asch. 1951. “Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments.” Dalam Groups, Leadership, and Men. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.

Utama, N. G., & Dinanti, P. A. (2024). The Depiction of Power Relations in Wish (2023) Through Foucauldian Perspective. LANGUAGE: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 5(3), 188-197. https://doi.org/10.51878/language.v5i3.6526

Zulkarnaen, R., Ruminda, & Awaludin, L. (2023). The British Colonial Power in George Orwell’s Burmese Days. CALL, 5(1), 67–77.