Politeness Strategies in Bahlil Lahadalia's Expressive Acts and Affective Color Responses on the Bukan Abuleke Podcast
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55909/jpbs.v5i2.1318Keywords:
politeness strategies, expressive acts, affective color responses, podcastAbstract
This study aims to describe Bahlil Lahadalia's politeness strategies, expressive speech acts, perlocutionary effects, and affective color responses in the Bukan Abuleke Podcast upload. Using a qualitative pragmatic approach, data were collected through listening and note-taking techniques, then analyzed using Brown and Levinson's taxonomy of politeness strategies and Searle's speech act theory. The results of the study revealed the dominance of Positive Politeness strategies (10 data) compared to Negative politeness, which reflects the speaker's intentional efforts to minimize social distance and build emotional closeness with the audience. Expressive acts were significantly dominated by the Praise category (8 data), which functioned as an instrument for building credibility through a narrative of personal resilience. The communication patterns found tended to be Direct and Literal (11 data), which effectively produced very strong Positive Responsive Verbal Nonverbal perlocutions (10 data). Affectively, the use of Humor (6 data) emerged as the main rhetorical instrument to defuse tension and respond to criticism diplomatically. The research conclusions indicate that Bahlil Lahadalia employs an adaptive communication style that integrates personal transparency with professional authority. This strategy successfully creates the image of a humanistic, inclusive, yet firm leader in disseminating state policies in the digital public sphere. These findings contribute to linguistic studies of public officials' rhetoric in new media formats.
References
Cummings, L. (2014). Pragmatic Disorders. Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7954-9
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cummings, L. (2014). Pragmatic Disorders. Edisi ke-1. New York: Springer.
Horn, L. R., & Ward, G. (Eds.). (2006). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Kementerian ESDM. (2026). Menteri Bahlil, King of Viral< þ - Podcast Bukan Abuleke eps. 01. Video YouTube, 17 Januari 2026. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjIuN_p_9sY
Leech, G. N. (2011). Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Penerjemah: M. D. D. Oka. Jakarta: UI-Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Keeffe, A., Clancy, B., & Adolphs, S. (2020). Introducing Pragmatics in Use. Edisi ke-2. London: Routledge.
Piani, R. T., Sumarti, S., Samhati, S., Rusminto, N. E., & Widodo, M. (2024). Strategi Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Kisah Tiga Pangeran. Widyaparwa, 52(2), Desember 2024, 150–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/wdprw.v52i2.1525
Prasetya, R. A. (2020). Tindak Ilokusi Ekspresif dalam Iklan Makanan di Televisi. Jurnal Kata (Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pembelajarannya), 8(1), April 2020, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/kata.v8i1.21200
Rusminto, N. E. (2020). Analisis Wacana. Cetakan ke-1. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Sumarlam, S., Pamungkas, S., & Susanti, R. (2023). Pemahaman dan Kajian Pragmatik. Cetakan ke-2. Surakarta: Bukukatta.
Sumarti, S. (2015). Strategi Kesantunan dan Ketidaksantunan dalam Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru. Disertasi. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.
Sumarti. (2016). Strategi Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru dan Respons Warna Afektif Siswa (Kajian Pragmatik dan Implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMP). Laporan Penelitian. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.
Wijana, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Cetakan ke-1. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nahdliya Izzatul Mutammimah, Sumarti, Nurlaksana Eko Sasminto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




