The English Curriculum Continuity and Pos Basic Learner’s Linguistic Performance in Burundi

Authors

  • Etienne Bikorimana Ecole Normale Supérieure, University of Burundi, Bujumbura, Burundi
  • Jeanine Ntihirageza Center for Genocide and Human Rights, Research in Africa and the Diaspora, Bujumbura, Burundi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55909/jpbs.v4i5.878

Keywords:

English curriculum continuity, post basic school, linguistic performance

Abstract

Using the descriptive-correlational research design, this study examined the basic and post basic programs used to teach English in Burundi education system in order to find out the extent to which curriculum continuity is ensured across the 2 levels. Curriculum continuity was therefore assessed following Ornstein and Hunkins’ (1988) bidimensional model. The study further aimed to determine the relationship between curriculum continuity and post basic learners’ linguistic performance. In this way, two research instruments were used to collect data, mainly the document analysis and a likert scale questionnaire which was administered to a population sample of 32 learners of languages section from some selected schools in Ntahangwa communal Directorate of Education. Frequency distribution and Pearson’s r correlation were the statistical tools used to treat the data from the questionnaire while the data from document analysis were analyzed qualitatively. Findings reveal that the curriculum continuity across the two levels is ensured to a little extent. Additionally, the majority of the respondents view the continuity of curriculum at a very low level. Results further demonstrate that there is a very strong and positive relationship between curriculum continuity and learners’ linguistic performance. The study finally recommends the government of Burundi, through the Ministry of Education, to assure a smooth junction across different levels of education especially in terms of curriculum design and its implementation. Teachers are also recommended to be more creative by helping their learners be able to use the target language in and outside the classroom.

References

Ahmad, D. (2013). EFL Materials: Their Types, roles, and Functions in ET/L Process. Retrieved from www.eslbase.com/articles/creating materials.

Akiri, A.A. (2013). Effects of Teachers’ Effectiveness on Students’ Academic Performance in Public Secondary Schools, Delta State, Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(3): 105-112.

Baker, W. (2009). The Cultures of English as a Lingua Franca. Tesol Quarterly, 567-592.

Chen, Y. (2002). Visual culture and its implication to art education curriculum design. Paper

Presented at the Michigan Art Education Association (MAEA) Conference Lansing, MI, October 25.

Doughty, C. (2003). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Huang, F.Q. (2003). Curriculum Reform in Contemporary China: Seven Goals and Six Strategies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 101 – 115.

Irambona, A. & Chang’ach, J.K. (2023). Instructional Materials and Their Influences on Students’ Academic Performance: A Case of Post-Basic School English Curriculum in Burundi. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 8(3), 2023, 309-323. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v8.i3.1184

Kothari, C. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd.

Loughran, J. (2014). Professional Development as a Teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 65 (4): 271-283.

Ndayimirije, M. I. (2015). The English Language Curriculum for State Primary Schools in Burundi: An Appraisal of its Adequacy and Implementation. Unpublished PhD, Thesis, Kenya: Kenyatta University.

Ornstein, A.C & Hunkins, F.R. (1998). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues. 3rd edition, Boston.Chicago: Hand hellally.

Reglin, G. (2002). Project Reading and Writing: Home Visitations and the School Involvement of High-Risk Families. Education, 123(1), 153-160.

Richards, J.C. & Rodgers, T.S. (1986). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language teaching: A Description and Analysis (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Uma, J.C., & Ponnambala, A.T. (2001). Teaching Writing Skill through Silent Movie: An Experiment. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 10 (1), 93-99.

Unanma, A.O., et al. (2013). Relationship between Teachers ‘Educational Qualifications and Students’ Achievements in Chemistry: A Case study of Owerri West LGA. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 1(1): 05-10

Downloads

Published

2025-09-23

How to Cite

Bikorimana, E., & Ntihirageza, J. . (2025). The English Curriculum Continuity and Pos Basic Learner’s Linguistic Performance in Burundi. Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa Dan Sastra, 4(5), 1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.55909/jpbs.v4i5.878