Dysphemism in the Novel A Portion of Chicken Noodles Before Dying: Analysis of Meaning, Form, Function, and Classification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55909/jpbs.v5i1.1135Keywords:
dysphemism, figurative language , novelAbstract
The novel Seporsi Mie Ayam Sebelum Mati represents the realities of the characters’ lives through the use of a firm, direct, and harshly nuanced style of language. One of the prominent linguistic features in this novel is dysphemism, which is employed as a stylistic device to openly depict conflict, emotional outbursts, and social criticism. In linguistic studies, dysphemism is not merely understood as the use of coarse expressions, but rather as a linguistic strategy that serves aesthetic and pragmatic functions in constructing literary meaning. Therefore, an analysis of dysphemism in this novel is essential to reveal the deepening of characterization and the social messages conveyed by the author. This study aims to describe the forms, classifications, and functions of dysphemism in the novel Seporsi Mie Ayam Sebelum Mati. The research was conducted through a library-based study, with the novel serving as the primary data source. The research population comprises all linguistic units found in the novel, while the research sample consists of words, phrases, and expressions containing dysphemistic elements. The research instruments include data cards and a dysphemism classification guideline based on stylistic and pragmatic theories. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively using content analysis techniques through the stages of identification, categorization, interpretation, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate that dysphemism in the novel can be classified into four forms: insults, mockery, negative labeling, and pejoration. These dysphemistic expressions function to realistically represent the characters’ emotions, construct characterization, strengthen plot dynamics, and convey social criticism both implicitly and explicitly.
References
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Chaer, A. (2009). Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chaer, A. (2010). Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). New York: Sage Publications.
Elmustian, E., & Jalil, A. (2015). Teori Sastra: Bahan Ajar. Pekanbaru: Laboratorium Bahasa dan
Endraswara, S. (2013). Stilistika Sastra: Teori dan Praktik Pengkajian Bahasa Sastra. Padang: Ombak.
Darusalam, G. & Hussin, S. (2016). Metodologi Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan: Amalan dan Analisis Kajian. 2nd Edition. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, E. W., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Keraf, G. (2010). Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Khrisna, B. (2021). Seporsi Mie Ayam Sebelum Mati. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Kridalaksana, H. (2011). Kamus Linguistik (4th ed.).Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Leech, G. (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. Longman.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Mahamod, Z. (2014). Psikolinguistik dan Pengajaran Bahasa. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. New York: Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurgiyantoro, B. (2018). Teori Pengkajian Fiksi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Rahmawati, D. (2020). Disfemisme dalam Novel Indonesia Kontemporer. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.24815/jbsi.v9i2.XXXX
Ratna, N. K. (2011). Stilistika: Kajian Puitika Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Razak, A. (2017). Menggapai Mixed Methods Bidang Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Pekanbaru: Ababil Press.
Sari, N. P. (2021). Fungsi Disfemisme dalam Dialog Fiksi sebagai Kritik Sosial. Jurnal Kajian Sastra, 5(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.31002/jks.v5i1.XXXX
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suhardi. (2013). Pengantar Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Sumardjo, J., & Saini, K. M. (2010). Apresiasi Kesusastraan. Jakarta: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Tarigan, H. G. (2013). Pengajaran Gaya Bahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Wijana, I. D. P., & Rohmadi, M. (2011). Analisis Wacana Pragmatik: Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Bandung: Yuma Pustaka.
Wiyatmi. (2013). Teori Sastra dan Penerapannya. Kanwa Publisher.
Yule, G. (2010). The Study of Language (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Linda Yulia Putri, Rahimatul Uthia, Nur Azizah, Widhi Choirunisa Putri, Yulinda Sahara, Farel Olva Zuve

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




