The Inner Conflict of the Main Character in Novel Bandung After Rain by Wulan Nurmalia: Literary Psychology Study

Authors

  • Syafira Fitrotul Hidayah UNISDA
  • Hendrik Furqon UNISDA
  • Iib Marzuqi UNISDA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55909/jpbs.v5i4.1703

Keywords:

inner conflict, main character, novel, literary psychology

Abstract

This research is motivated by the depiction of a strong inner conflict in the main character in Wulan Nur Amalia's novel Bandung After Rain. This inner conflict is interesting to study because it reflects the psychological dynamics of humans in facing various life pressures, both internal and social. This study uses a literary psychology approach based on Albertine Minderop's theory, which emphasizes the dynamics of human personality. The purpose of this research is to describe the forms of inner conflict experienced by the main character and to identify the factors that influence the emergence of this conflict in Wulan Nur Amalia's novel Bandung After Rain. The method used in this research is a qualitative descriptive method with content analysis techniques. The research data were obtained from quotations in the novel that describe the main character's inner conflict, then analyzed based on Albertine Minderop's literary psychology theory, specifically the concepts of the id, ego, and superego. The results show that the main character experiences various forms of inner conflict, such as conflict between desires and reality, guilt, anxiety, and emotional stress in facing life's problems and social relationships. This conflict is influenced by internal factors in the form of psychological struggles and external factors in the form of environmental pressures and traumatic experiences. Based on the analysis, the main character's inner conflict demonstrates the dominant imbalance between the id, ego, and superego within the character.

Author Biographies

Syafira Fitrotul Hidayah , UNISDA

Mahasiswa program studi pendidikan bahasa dan sastra indonesia, fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan, Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan 

Hendrik Furqon, UNISDA

Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan 

Iib Marzuqi , UNISDA

Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan 

References

Afifuddin, A. & Saebani, B. A. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Alfajri, R. M., Adilla, I., & Zurmailis, Z. (2021). Konflik Batin Tokoh Utama dalam Novel Lampuki. Jurnal Puitika, 17(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.25077/puitika.17.2.99-104.2021

Amalia, W. N. (2024). Bandung After Rain. Jakarta: Black Swan Books. https://www.google.com/search?q=Bandung+After+Rain+Wulan+Nur+Amalia

Ayuwulandari, S. P., Rahmayantis, M. D., & Sujarwoko. (2024). Konflik Batin Tokoh dalam Novel Rasa Karya Tere Liye: Kajian Psikologi Sastra. Kopula: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pendidikan, 6(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.29303/kopula.v6i2.5256

Endraswara, S. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Sastra: Epistemologi, Model, Teori, dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Widyatama.

Fatika, A. A., et al.. (2025). “Analisis Campur Kode pada Novel Bandung After Rain.” Jurnal Basataka. https://jurnal.pbsi.uniba-bpn.ac.id/index.php/BASATAKA/article/view/635

Lestari, A., & Sugiarti, S. (2023). Konflik Batin pada Tokoh Utama dalam Novel Rasa Karya Tere Liye: Analisis Psikologi Sastra. Sintesis, 17(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.24071/sin.v17i2.5689

Minderop, A. (2010). Psikologi Sastra: Karya, Metode, Teori, dan Contoh Kasus. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2018). Teori Pengkajian Fiksi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Nurzakiyah, A., & Dewi, D. W. C. (2025). Konflik Batin Tokoh Utama dalam Novel Logika Asa. MANTRA: Jurnal Sastra Indonesia. https://jurnal.uts.ac.id/mantra/article/view/5678

Pratomo, N. W., Gustiasari, D. R., & Sudarti, Z. (2022). Konflik Batin Tokoh Utama dalam Crpen Orang Gila. Jurnal Sasindo. https://doi.org/10.32493/sasindo.v10i2.54-58

Pujiarti, H., Tiyana, M. S., & Samudra, A. D. (2024). Konflik Batin Tokoh Utama dalam Antologi Cerpen Kekalahan. Literature Research Journal. https://jurnal.ppjb-sip.org/index.php/dlrj/article/view/894

Putri, S. P. A., Rahmayantis, M. D., & Sujarwoko. (2024). Analisis Konflik Batin dalam Novel Rasa. Kopula. https://doi.org/10.29303/kopula.v6i2.5256

Ratna, N. K. (2022). Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ratri, T. S., Widyastuti, S. H., & Mulyana. (2025). Konflik Batin Tokoh Utama dalam Novel Sri Kuning. Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra. https://doi.org/10.21067/jibs.v11i2.10351

Razak, A. (2017). Metode Riset: Menggapai Mixed Methods Bidang Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Pekanbaru: Ababil Press.

Semi, M. A. (1993). Metode Penelitian Sastra. Bandung: Angkasa.

Siswanto, W. (2008). Pengantar Teori Sastra. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Sugiyono, S. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukini, I. P. A., Amertawengrum, I. P., & Suseno, D. (2023). Konflik Batin Tokoh Utama Novel Terusir Karya Hamka: Analisis Psikologi Sastra. JBSI: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.47709/jbsi.v4i02.5007

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. 2016. Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. Wiley.

Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1956). Theory of Literature. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=hubungan+karya+sastra+dan+psikologi+sastra

Wiyatmi, W. (2020). Psikologi sastra: Teori dan Aplikasinya. Yogyakarta: Kanwa Publisher.

Yuliani, W. (2018). Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif dalam Perspektif Bimbingan dan Konseling. QUANTA: Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan fan Konseling falam Pendidikan, 2 (2), 83–91.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-27

How to Cite

fitrotul, syafira, Furqon, H., & Marzuqi , I. . (2026). The Inner Conflict of the Main Character in Novel Bandung After Rain by Wulan Nurmalia: Literary Psychology Study. Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa Dan Sastra, 5(4), 3407–3414. https://doi.org/10.55909/jpbs.v5i4.1703